arturo698839

18.10.2020 • 

English

Suppose you are the narrator’s attorney, assigned to defend him in the aftermath of the murder he committed. Since the narrator freely admitted to the police that he committed the crime, you have decided to have him enter a plea of “not guilty by reason of insanity.” First, identify evidence in the text that you believe most strongly illustrates the narrator’s psychological state before, during, and after the murder. Then, identify details that you would advise the narrator to leave out during his testimony, as they reflect poorly on his character and might alienate or offend the jury. Finally, based on text evidence, construct a brief “closing argument” to the jury that makes the case that the narrator is not guilty by reason of insanity for the crime of murder.

Ответ:

Ashthegreat

06.09.2022

English

---

Since there is no options, I'm going to take a shot in the dark. I'm thinking that the answer would be epiglottitis, simply because any movement or excess probing into the child's airway could cause it to swell up and completely occlude the airway. Then, a surgical airway would have to be placed.

That's my best guess without further options.

---

0,0(0 оценок)