chloeholt123
19.10.2019 •
English
The others say that mrs. schächter has gone mad. is mrs. schächter really insane when she screams? in the end, who is really out of his or her mind?
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- F Food and Cooking How to Calculate the Gender of Your Child with Blood?...
- S Society and Politics 10 Tips for Boosting Your Self-Esteem...
- C Computers and Internet How to Create a Folder on Your iPhone?...
- G Goods and services How to sew a ribbon: Tips for beginners...
- F Food and Cooking How to Make Mayonnaise at Home? Secrets of Homemade Mayonnaise...
- C Computers and Internet Which Phone is Best for Internet Surfing?...
- F Food and Cooking Everything You Need to Know About Pasta...
- C Computers and Internet How to Choose a Monitor?...
- H Horoscopes, Magic, Divination Where Did Tarot Cards Come From?...
Answers on questions: English
- E English Choose the answer. how does cassius feel about the way other romans are treating caesar? question 5 options: cassius thinks the people who adore caesar are silly and rather foolish....
- M Mathematics In paragraph form using 125 words or more, explain why it is important to begin planning for retirement early...
- P Physics Image distance of a object if magnification is 2.9 and object distance is 40...
- E English Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee...
Ответ:
Thanks please :)
Ответ:
He is referring to people who reject a responsibility that is theirs.
Explanation:
Through the context of your question, we can see that you are referring to the article "Hers" written by Jacoby, where he reflects on censorship, feminism, obscenity and p0r.n0g*4p** within a society. For Jacoby, the censorship of works with content considered obscene and p0r.n0g*4p*c is an insult to the first constitutional amendment, since for him these works represent the freedom of expression that is allowed within the country. Within this context, he states that it is not the State's duty to carry out this type of censorship, but that each citizen must decide whether or not he wants to consume this type of content, when he is of the right age to make that decision.
Although in the article, he agrees that children should not have access to such works, he says that it is the duty of parents to prevent children from having access to works with obscene content and not the duty of the government. In this case, children cannot be used as an argument to defend p0r.n0g*4p** censorship, except by people who reject their responsibility because of the general desire to transfer that responsibility to institutions.