![Jalenmiller492](/avatars/49725.jpg)
Jalenmiller492
06.11.2019 •
English
What is the central idea of the first paragraph of the dark game
Solved
Show answers
More tips
Answers on questions: English
- M Mathematics A group of 320 people go on an excursion to a natural park. The price per person is 345 euros. If 97,635 euros were collected for this trip, how many people did not go on the...
- E English This statement iS A) objective because it is influenced by feelings or opinions. B) objective because it is not influenced by feelings or opinions. C) subjective because it is...
- M Mathematics Cindy saves $420 each month. her monthly salary is $2100. what is the ratio of the amount cindy saves to the amount she earns each month? a) 1: 5← b) 1: 4 c) 2: 3 d) 5: 1 my answer...
- C Chemistry 1. Which argument can BEST be made about the motion of the baseball and the motion of the can when the baseball hits the can...
- M Mathematics Erica works in the ticket booth at the local skating rink . On Thursday afternoon , she sold 66 total tickets . Of the tickets she sold , 1/3 were adult tickets and the rest were...
Ответ:
1) The Civil War lasted longer than people first expected it to last.
Ответ:
B. Henry Taylor's article keeps saying that Victor Hugo was against
Napoleon, but he never backs it up.
Explanation:
A credible source is an information source that is unbiased, trustworthy and reliable. Also, a credible source is typically backed up by evidence from various information channels and should be accurate.
In order to validate a credible source, it is necessary to ensure that the information provided is checked against other reliable sources to verify its level of accuracy.
As a rule, any credible information source should have multiple ways to validate the informations being presented i.e it should be factually backed up with evidence.
In a group discussion, the best example of challenging the credibility of a source would be; Henry Taylor's article keeps saying that Victor Hugo was against Napoleon, but he never backs it up. Henry's article isn't credible because it isn't backed up with any evidence or source to validate the claim that Victor Hugo was against Napoleon.