What should you not do when evaluating an opponent's supporting points? A) Consider whether the appeals are convincing

B) Ignore any good argument strategies

C) Ask if the evidence is convincing

D) Look for problems in the premises behind the argument

B

Explanation:

If you ignore their argument strategies, then you would be missing out on different ways to convey your own message, but if you do you would have a variety of different ones.

1: [a] sitting

(b) who

(c)shall

2: (a): of

(b): those

(c): more

Explanation: these are the only 2 i'll do for now because they are hard to see and it's taking long because of that