![jennifer7037](/avatars/47782.jpg)
jennifer7037
19.11.2019 •
English
Which statement best describes when the narrator and his brother drop the soap cake into the tub of fish in "the strangers that came to town"?
a. it is part of the story's rising action.
b. it is part of the story's falling action.
c. it is the story's climax.
d. it is part of the story's exposition.
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- S Sport How to Do a Jumping Split...
- A Animals and plants What Do Terriers Eat?...
- F Food and Cooking Discover the Benefits and Properties of Dates...
- C Computers and Internet Dynamically Assigned IP Address: What Is It and How Does It Work?...
- S Style and Beauty How to Get Rid of Acne: Scientifically Proven Methods...
- H Health and Medicine Simple Ways to Lower Cholesterol in the Blood: Tips and Tricks...
- O Other How to Choose the Best Answer to Your Question on The Grand Question ?...
- L Leisure and Entertainment History of International Women s Day: When Did the Celebration of March 8th Begin?...
- S Style and Beauty Intimate Haircut: The Reasons, Popularity, and Risks...
- A Art and Culture When Will Eurovision 2011 Take Place?...
Answers on questions: English
- E English WIll MARK BrAiNliEsT if YOu HelP Me! PLZ HELP ME WITH THIS ESSAY!!! i already did the introduction paragraph, just need the 3 body paragraphs and conclusion. the second attachment...
- E English In this poem, Hughes compares his sadness to a soul piano song...
- M Mathematics ZAP has coordinates Z (-1,5), A (1,3), and P (-2,4). A translation maps point Z to Z (1,1). Find the coordinates of A’ and P’ under the translation...
- M Mathematics How does the value of the 8 in 20,831 compare to the value of the 8 in 20,381?...
- P Physics 1. What three particles are found in an atom?...
Ответ:
hopes it helps
Ответ:
The National Conference of Teachers of English (NCTE) has declared today a National Day on Writing. I celebrate such a day. The introduction of my book "Writing Tools" imagines what America might look like and sound like if we declared ourselves a “nation of writers.” After all, what good is freedom of expression if we lack the means to express ourselves?
To mark this day – and to honor language arts teachers everywhere – Poynter is republishing an essay I wrote almost a decade ago. Remember? It was the spring of 2008 and Barack Obama was running for president. Many of us wondered if America was ready to elect an African-American president (a man with the middle name Hussein).
To dispel the fears of some white Americans and to advance his chances for election, Obama delivered a major address on race in America, a speech that was praised even by some of his adversaries. Obama had/has a gift for language. He is a skilled orator. To neutralize that advantage, his opponents – including Hillary Clinton at one point – would characterize Obama’s words as empty “rhetoric” – an elaborate trick of language.
The Spring of 2008 seems like such a long time ago. A time just before the Great Recession. A time just before the ascendancy of social networks and the trolls who try to poison them. A time before black lives were said to matter in a more assertive way. A time before fake news was anything more dangerous that a piece of satire in the Onion. A time before Colin Kaepernick took a knee — except when he was tired. A time before torch-bearing white supremacists marched through the night in Charlottesville, Virginia.
It feels like the perfect time for a restart on a conversation about race. To prepare us, let’s take another look at the words of Barack Obama before he was president. Let’s review what he said, and, more important, how and why he said it. My X-ray analysis of that speech is meant not as a final word on that historical moment, but as an invitation, a doorway to a room where we can all reflect on American history and the American language.
Have a great National Day on Writing.
* * *
More than a century ago, scholar and journalist W.E.B. DuBois wrote a single paragraph about how race is experienced in America. I have learned more from those 112 words than from most book-length studies of the subject:
After the Egyptian and Indian, the Greek and Roman, the Teuton and Mongolian, the Negro is a sort of seventh son, born with a veil, and gifted with second-sight in this American world, a world which yields him no true self-consciousness, but only lets him see himself through the revelation of the other world. It is a peculiar sensation, this double-consciousness, this sense of always looking at one's self through the eyes of others, of measuring one's soul by the tape of a world that looks on in amused contempt and pity. One ever feels his two-ness, — an American, a Negro; two souls, two thoughts, two unreconciled strivings; two warring ideals in one dark body, whose dogged strength alone keeps it from being torn asunder."
Much has been said about the power and brilliance of Barack Obama's March 18 speech on race, even by some of his detractors. The focus has been on the orator's willingness to say things in public about race that are rarely spoken at all, even in private, and his expressed desire to move the country to a new and better place. There has also been attention to the immediate purpose of the speech, which was to reassure white voters that they had nothing to fear from the congregant of a fiery African-American pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright.
Amid all the commentary, I have yet to see an X-Ray reading of the text that would make visible the rhetorical strategies that the orator and authors used so effectively. When received in the ear, these effects breeze through us like a harmonious song. When inspected with the eye, these moves become more apparent, like reading a piece of sheet music for a difficult song and finally recognizing the chord changes.
Such analysis, while interesting in itself, might be little more than a scholarly curiosity if we were not so concerned with the language issues of political discourse. The popular opinion is that our current president, though plain spoken, is clumsy with language. Fair or not, this perception has produced a hope that our next president will be a more powerful communicator, a Kennedy or Reagan, perhaps, who can use language less as a way to signal ideology and more as a means to bring the disparate parts of the nation together. Journalists need to pay closer attention to political language than ever before.