History: Anti-federalists argued that a) branches of government would keep each other in balance. b) it was impossible to separate government into equal branches. c) the constitution would create a republican government. d) a republic should protect people from the government and from each other.

Anti-federalists argued that a) branches of government

Ответ:

StephenCurry34

08.01.2022

Anti-Federalists argued that it was impossible to separate government into equal branches. So the answer is B. it was impossible to separate government into equal branches.

0,0(0 оценок)

Ответ:

brennanjb00

07.06.2020

History

Sample response: Adele is not correct. There are only 5 choices. Here, we are not able to use the fundamental counting principle because there are different choices for each material.

Step-by-step explanation:

0,0(0 оценок)

Anti-federalists argued that

a) branches of government would keep each other in balance.
b) it was impossible to separate government into equal branches.
c) the constitution would create a republican government.
d) a republic should protect people from the government and from each other.

Ответ:

Ответ:

Ask your question to the AI advisor

More tips

Answers on questions: History

Ask an AI advisor a question