goldenarrow
goldenarrow
07.07.2019 • 
History

Aresident of city a (located in the northern district of state
a.brought a diversity action against a resident of city b (located in the eastern district of state b). the cause of action arose in city
b. the defendant commutes daily from his home in city b to his office in city a and would find it much more convenient to litigate the action there than in city c, where the appropriate court for the eastern district of state b is located. the plaintiff would also find it more convenient to litigate in city a, but will go to city c if necessary. may the action be litigated in city a?

Solved
Show answers

Ask an AI advisor a question