Can somebody plz answer this question I’m desperate :/ WILL MARK BRAINLIEST I PROMISE :DDD (whoever answers first) thanks!

From Darl:
Tull's wagon stands beside the spring, hitched to the rail, the
reins wrapped about the seat stanchion. In the wagon bed are
two chairs. Jewel stops the spring and takes the gourd from
the willow branch and drinks. I pass him and mount the path,
beginning to hear Cash's saw.
When I reach the top he has quit sawing. Standing in a litter of
chips, he is fitting two of the boards together. Between the
shadow spaces they are yellow as gold, like soft gold, bearing on
their flanks in smooth undulations the marks of the adze blade: a
good carpenter, Cash is. He holds the two planks on the trestle,
fitted along the edges in a quarter of the finished box. He kneels
and squints along the edge of them, then he lowers them and
takes up the adze. A good carpenter. Addie Bundren could not
want a better one, better box to lie in. It will give her confidence
and comfort
How do the two narrators differ in how they tell the story of Addie Bundren's
impending death, and what does the reader learn about each narrator? Be sure to
use specific details from the text to support your answer.

My compatriots,

although it might seem to all of you that such a proposition is meant to benefit myself and other merchants only, I beg you to pay attention to the words that I bring you, since they might be very good to all of you.

Yes, I want better deals for myself as well and I want things to be better for myself. What you might not understand is how trading with other countries is better for all of us, not only myself.

Having what to sell for a better price makes me richer, but if all of us have access to the same cargo, not only are we free to trade without abusive taxation, but the competition would only allow those who can sell for the lowest price to make some money out of such endeavor, and lower prices are good for the buyer.

Selling to Britain or buying from them and only them gets us stuck in a situation where they can dictate our destinies at any moment. Producing too much and having no one to sell to if Britain refuses our merchandise will make us produce even less, rising the cost of what is done, since we can't risk losing all our work and production.

I urge you to consider that as a country of producers, we all wish to sell and buy for better costs and we all wish to be rewarded for our work instead of being adrift under Britain's influence. Let us open the market. Let us buy from the world and sell to the world.