"civil and religious liberty are inseparably " ~ maryland farmer, essay 7 what is the "maryland farmer" trying to illustrate about the protection needed by government in his statement? a bad government will oppress religious liberties more than civil liberties a government that is good at securing civil liberties will also keep religious liberties. civil liberties are at risk if religions are given too much freedom religious liberties need separate protections from civil liberties.

The correct answer is B) A government that is good at securing civil liberties will also keep religious liberties.

What the "Maryland Farmer" was trying to illustrate about the protection needed by the government in his statement was "A government that is good at securing civil liberties will also keep religious liberties."

The "Maryland Farmer" was part of the Antifederalists Papers that started on September 25, 1787. These essays were in opposition to the Federalists Papers written by Alexander Hamilton and John Adams, under the synonym of "Publius."

Antifederalists also used synonyms to sign their essays. George Clinton used the synonym of "Cato," or Samuel Adams used "Centinel."

Explanation:

When reading a story in which the characters do not offer moral complexity, readers do not expect stories to be long. It is expected to find characters with little moral complexity in stories that leave a take away message. However, in novels, the reader expects something more complex. For example, if the story is about a serial killer, it would be good to find, a character who is very intelligent and has a strong family life, but has the underlying and dark life as a serial killer. It is exciting to find a story in which the antagonist is loved and hated at the same time, for example a serial killer who deeply loves his children and his wife. This is that complex characters alleviate contradictions such as the one mentioned above. The person in the story is a serial killer, he is intelligent and has a good family life, those are contradictions that do not make sense for the morality of most readers, they just do not fit into our scheme.