KArrington815
15.10.2019 •
History
During apartheid, blacks had to live in separate areas known as often crowded clusters of tiny homes.
a. townships
b. cape of good hope
c. great zimbabwe
d. colonies
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- C Computers and Internet Dynamically Assigned IP Address: What Is It and How Does It Work?...
- H Health and Medicine Angina: Causes, Symptoms, and Treatment...
- C Computers and Internet How to Learn to Type Fast?...
- F Food and Cooking Delight for Gourmets: How to Prepare Liver Pate...
- S Style and Beauty How to braid friendship bracelets?...
- H Health and Medicine Mercury Thermometer Danger: What to do when a thermometer breaks?...
- F Food and Cooking Which Calamari Salad is the Most Delicious?...
- S Society and Politics 10 Tips for Boosting Your Self-Esteem...
- F Food and Cooking The Most Delicious and Simple Fish in Batter Recipe...
- H Health and Medicine What is Autism? Understanding the Basics of This Neurodevelopmental Disorder...
Answers on questions: History
- H History ITEM BANK: Move to Bottom 535 Members Enforces Laws Interprets Laws Makes Laws The Cabinet The President Leads The Senate The Supreme Court Executive Judicial Legislative...
- H History Using SOAP( speaker,occasional,audience and purpose ), provide a 4-5 summary/POV statement for the following paragraph...
- H History What were some of the obstacles to overcome in getting the states to trust in this new document and style of government?...
- H History America had different economic activities which caused what effect?...
- H History Now Zeus the lord of cloud roused in the north a storm against the ships, and driving veilsof squall moved down like night on land and sea.The bows went plunging at the gust; sailscracked...
- H History How did a surplus of food lead to the first civilizations?...
- H History Was the creation of Israel a good or bad idea...
- H History Why did King Louis XIV move the palace to Versailles?...
- H History * True/False: Most jazz songs sound very similar. O True False...
- H History Match the following items. 1. belonging to, like, or characteristic of the middle ages crusaders 2. lord of the manor noble 3. a series of wars between christians and turks muslim...
Ответ:
Other options, such as b and c refer to actual places (Great Zimbabwe is a city), not a type of settlement, and colonies were countries dependent on other countries.
Ответ:
Ответ:
It’s often said that winners dictate history. Not so for the medieval holy wars called the Crusades.
Muslim forces ultimately expelled the European Christians who invaded the eastern Mediterranean repeatedly in the 12th and 13th centuries—and thwarted their effort to regain control of sacred Holy Land sites such as Jerusalem. Still, most histories of the Crusades offer a largely one-sided view, drawn originally from European medieval chronicles, then filtered through 18th and 19th-century Western scholars.
But how did Muslims at the time view the invasions? (Not always so contentiously, it turns out.) And what did they think of the European interlopers? (One common cliché: “unwashed barbarians.”) For a nuanced view of the medieval Muslim world, HISTORY talked with two prominent scholars: Paul M. Cobb, professor of Islamic History at the University of Pennsylvania, author of Race for Paradise: An Islamic History of the Crusades, and Suleiman A. Mourad, a professor of religion at Smith College and author of The Mosaic of Islam.
HISTORY: Broadly speaking, how do Islamic perspectives on the Crusades differ from those of the Christian sources from Western Europe?
Suleiman Mourad: If we wrote the history of the Crusades based on Islamic narratives, it would be a completely different story altogether. There were no doubt wars and bloodshed, but that wasn’t the only or dominant story. There was also coexistence, political compromise, trade, scientific exchange, love. We have poetry and chronicles with evidence of mixed marriages.
Do Muslim perspectives match Western ones in terms of chronology and geography?
Paul Cobb: Chronologically, Muslim sources differ from the Christians because they don’t recognize the Crusades. They recognize the events we call the Crusades today simply as another wave of Frankish aggression on the Muslim world. (I use “Franks” or “Frankish” to refer to western Christians.) For them, the Crusades didn’t begin in Clermont with Pope Urban’s 1095 speech [rallying crusaders], as most historians say, but rather decades earlier. By 1060 Christians were not only nibbling at the edges of the Islamic world, but were actually gaining territory in Sicily and Spain. And whereas most Western historians recognize the 1291 fall of Acre as the end of the main Crusades, Muslim historians don’t see the end of the Frankish threat until, I would say, the mid-15th century, when Ottoman armies conquer Constantinople.
SM: To say the Crusades started in Clermont in 1095 and ended at Acre in 1291, we are fooling ourselves. History is not that clean cut. What came before and after reflected a lot of continuity and not abrupt change.