barbaramathews1123

31.10.2019 • 

History

Eight months after the schenck decision, the court again applied the clear and present danger principle. holmes dissented in that case, stating that unlike the schenck case, actions of the convicted man in teh second case had little or no effect on teh nation's war effort. what do you think this reveals about holmes attitude toward free speeck guarantees?

Ответ:

jessiejohnsonjr123

08.01.2022

History

---

Holmes’s subsequent dissent reveals that he greatly respected the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of speech and that he was willing to limit those guarantees only in times of crisis when a real and definite danger threatened the nation and the clear and present danger principle could be applied.

---

0,0(0 оценок)

Ответ:

eggg65

30.04.2021

History

---

Is the first question on the pretest. 

1. Which artists produced work during the Italian Renaissance? Select all that apply. 

---

0,0(0 оценок)