Explain how daisy and winterbourne symbolize america and europe, respectively. your answer should be at least 250 words.

Henry James was eager to analyze the new experience of Americans having access to the European culture thanks to the industrialization and the possibility to travel faster. In his book, he created two main characters: Daisy Miller and Frederick Winterbourne. Daisy was American and Winterbourne lived most of his life in Geneve, both characters show different traits of the personality, characterizing each society. On one hand, Daisy had the innocence of the new world and the lack of social manners, an "uncultivated" girl according to Winterbourne. On the other hand, Winterbourne was extremely strict and his manner of speaking was as mentioned by Daisy, "stiff". Both were part of different worlds and found in each other a different universe. Winterbourne was captivated by Daisy, who was less proper than all European girls he had met so far. These descriptions can be encased in the ones of the countries we mentioned.

The Roman Empire and the Roman republic had each moments of political instability.

success of the Roman Empire

-The success of the Roman Empire has to do with the extent of their domain. They had lots of cities under their control and it was a large empire. Unlike the Roman Republic which spread was towards the italian peninsula, the Roman Empire had a large spread from the byzantine .

They are stable political structure , they were organised in terms of leadership

-Success of the Roman Republic

-They were able to manage internal political struggle e.g the struggle of orders

-The Republic lasted for centuries

Failure of the Roman Republic

Internal crisis which later led to the demise of the republic

-social unrest

-fiancial crisis to keep up with the expenses of the state

Failure of the Roman Empire

-The empire fell because the leaders failed in enforcement of certain riles which created room for instability

-The Empire could not manage its expansion and had to spend a lot on military prowess and machinery to establish its rule where ever they went. This later led to its fall.

Conclusion

-The roman Empire and Republic would have managed her leadership well in terms of Government spending

-They out to enforce the will of the state and bring every offenders to book

-They would have strengthened their military might internally and externally which will not have led to the attacks by the Barbarians.

-

Explanation:

The Roman Empire and the Roman republic had each moments of political instability.

success of the Roman Empire

-The success of the Roman Empire has to do with the extent of their domain. They had lots of cities under their control and it was a large empire. Unlike the Roman Republic which spread was towards the italian peninsula, the Roman Empire had a large spread from the byzantine .

They are stable political structure , they were organised in terms of leadership

-Success of the Roman Republic

-They were able to manage internal political struggle e.g the struggle of orders

-The Republic lasted for centuries

Failure of the Roman Republic

Internal crisis which later led to the demise of the republic

-social unrest

-fiancial crisis to keep up with the expenses of the state

Failure of the Roman Empire

-The empire fell because the leaders failed in enforcement of certain riles which created room for instability

-The Empire could not manage its expansion and had to spend a lot on military prowess and machinery to establish its rule where ever they went. This later led to its fall.

Conclusion

-The roman Empire and Republic would have managed her leadership well in terms of Government spending

-They out to enforce the will of the state and bring every offenders to book

-They would have strengthened their military might internally and externally which will not have led to the attacks by the Barbarians.

-