How did u-boats affect american neutrality?
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- G Goods and services Don t Let Your Fridge Smell Bother You: How to Get Rid of Unpleasant Odors in Your Refrigerator...
- A Animals and plants What Do Terriers Eat?...
- F Food and Cooking Discover the Benefits and Properties of Dates...
- C Computers and Internet Dynamically Assigned IP Address: What Is It and How Does It Work?...
- S Style and Beauty How to Get Rid of Acne: Scientifically Proven Methods...
- H Health and Medicine Simple Ways to Lower Cholesterol in the Blood: Tips and Tricks...
- O Other How to Choose the Best Answer to Your Question on The Grand Question ?...
- L Leisure and Entertainment History of International Women s Day: When Did the Celebration of March 8th Begin?...
- S Style and Beauty Intimate Haircut: The Reasons, Popularity, and Risks...
- A Art and Culture When Will Eurovision 2011 Take Place?...
Answers on questions: History
- H History The freedom of information act of 1966 had the unforeseen consequence of...
- H History What the thing that women in saudi arabia wear?...
- H History The revolt against france s increasingly centralized monarchy in 1648-1652 is generally known as...
- H History Why does the army give the parent of a dead soldier an american flag...
- H History Nations governed only by one central government are known as systems...
- H History How many american pioneers died heading west...
- H History Answer all parts of the question that follows. Pls (A) Describe ONE way in which technological developments affected European manorial systems in the period c. 1200-c....
- H History What would you love to be snacking on right now?...
- H History Native Americans that share the same language, traditions, and way of life would mean they are all a part of the same...
- H History Where was the first permanent European settlement in North America found? A) Richmond, Virginia. B) St. Augustine, Florida. C) Plymouth, Massachusetts. D) Roanoke Island,...
Ответ:
The German U-boats blocked British Isle and attacked merchant ships affecting the trading business of US with British, but at some stage the U-boats started to attack ships taking the lives of unarmed passengers, as with the Lusitania ship, which 120 American died. The Germans were asked to stop the attacks but they did not and many US ships sank, shedding off US citizens lives. The submarine warfare enraged the US neutrality which then turned against the German and declared war on March 1 in 1917.
Ответ:
1. There is small amount of bias in the first passage. The author seems to favor passive resistance over people who use brute force, or extremists. He says the people who use brute force over being a passive resistor “devoid of courage and manhood.” To some, that could be very offensive. In the second passage their doesn’t appear to be any bias, if so, it is virtually undetectable. Nelson seems to know both sides of the story and speaks in a way that all people can get behind. He is obviously knowledgeable about what he’s speaking on.
2.Gandhi talks about the English at one point and that makes me think that they are trying to add their “two cents” to what India already has. In the second source, I think Nelson is speaking on the government and police systems being corrupt and them abusing their power. He said he decided to meet violence with violence, which means something was happening before he decided to get involved. If I was unable to determine the context, I personally might search what article, book, etc. the excerpt comes from to get a better understanding. With the second passage, it doesn’t come from a specific source that is listed so I might search words or phrases that are used to see where they come from.
3.Due to the fact that there is bias present in the first source, I would say that while it is still reliable, it might not be the first source I use to get evidence. The fact that it was written by Ghandi is a small redeeming factor. The second source, I would definitely use. It is a firsthand statement by Nelson Mandela, and he is very honest about the events that unfolded. To determine a sources reliability, I would first check the accuracy of the information with what I already know. I would also check where the source comes from and who wrote it as well as the type of source it is. Lastly, I would check for bias.
4. They both talk and address the government and the powers that are corrupt at different points in the passages. The main difference between the two is that in the 1st passage, the standpoint is more the difference in the people that are fighting back against the oppressors, while in the 2nd passage the standpoint is of a person fighting back that knows they could’ve did it differently and the events that took place didn’t have to happen. They both confirm that repressive governments need to be handled and that it is the publics job to call them out and step in when necessary. For me personally, to find a source that would corroborate another one, I would search for the overall theme or message of the source I already have. Then based on what comes up find a short passage that I can use.
Ok, that was a lot. Could i maybe get brainliest?
Explanation: