geliyahmoore1
02.02.2020 •
History
How has global communication influenced the spread of democracy ?
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- H Health and Medicine Headache: A Comprehensive Guide to Treatment...
- G Goods and services Stock center - a modern way of optimizing logistics...
- F Food and Cooking How to Properly Wash a Down Jacket? Tips from Experts...
- C Computers and Internet Thin Client: What It Is and Why You Need It?...
- F Food and Cooking The Most Delicious and Simple Fish in Batter Recipe...
- F Food and Cooking Red Caviar: How to Choose the Best?...
- C Computers and Internet Clearing Cache: How to Speed Up Your Browser...
- S Style and Beauty How are artificial nails removed?...
- S Style and Beauty Secrets of Tying a Pareo: 5 Ways...
Answers on questions: History
- H History How do the British government’s attempts to control and regulate the colonies during this tumultuous era provide a case in point?...
- H History Which is the most valid definition of term revolution...
- H History Enter the word you received when you completed the Unit 3 Review activity....
- H History After world war 1, the balance of power in europe shifted as a result of...
- H History According to the votes shown in the table, who opposed the civil rights act of 1964? members of the republican party members of the democrat party residents of northern...
- H History 1. why do countries trade and what determines what they trade?...
- H History Will mark ! the us constitution divides power between the state and federal governments. determine whether the following powers are delegated to the federal government,...
- H History What did the virginia plan propose? a. two houses of congress with representation based on state population b. one house of congress with equal representation from...
- H History President lyndon b. johnson was able to see through the passage of the civil rights act of 1964, legally ending public segregation, and the of 1965, which reinforced...
- H History On what grounds did the austrian-born economist friedrich a. hayek reject the new deal state? • he was convinced that even the best intentioned government planning...
Ответ:
An enduring tenet of the post-Cold War era is that globalization can be a catalyst for democratization. In one formulation, when democratic ideals sweep (or even trickle) across borders into authoritarian states, globalization makes democratization inevitable. Proponents of this view point to the contagion of democratic transitions in the world over the past quarter-century and to the ability of technology to penetrate the most closed societies. Even the Orwellian North Korean government, they point out, has gone gingerly online, though the country’s broader population has no electronic access to the outside world.
But these broad trends cannot yet confirm a strong and direct connection between globalization and democratization. The evidence is mixed and will continue to be so for some time. For every society in which a “people’s power” revolution is helped along by international cheering squads and satellite television, another is daily becoming more cosmopolitan while adhering to traditional (and often authoritarian) practices. The city-state of Singapore, rated as “most global” on the A.T. Kearny/Foreign Policy magazine Globalization Index in terms of cross-border contact between people, has remained resolutely semi-authoritarian for the past 30 years and shows few signs of greater democratization. Moreover, while entire regions, particularly in the former Eastern bloc, embraced economic globalization and more open political processes at the onset of the 1990s, by the end of the decade many new democracies were faltering under the weight of globalization, whether because of unfavorable economic trends or greater transnational crime. It may not yet be possible to make a final judgment about the connection between globalization and democracy, but a closer look will clarify where globalization has helped democratization, where it has inhibited movement toward greater openness, and, assuming an increased pace of globalization, what the greater flows of people and ideas will mean for the world’s governments and societies in the years ahead.
Toward International Norms of Democracy
Perhaps the most tangible evidence of globalization’s impact on democratization has been the infusion of democratic norms, and the principles of human rights that support them, into many international and regional institutions. The principle of accountability for human rights abuse is increasingly unfettered by national borders, as the 1998 arrest of former Chilean President Augusto Pinochet in London demonstrated. The ad hoc United Nations war crimes tribunal that was convened for the former Yugoslavia in the early 1990s was extended to Rwanda in the middle of the decade, presaging a broader move toward international justice. In the coming decade, the establishment of an International Criminal Court will be a watershed in that move.
Democratic principles are also reshaping regional institutions. The European Union, originally an economic community, now requires democratic government as a precondition for membership and promotes democracy in its collective foreign policy. The Organization of American States, once a diplomatic forum for both democratic and nondemocratic governments, now works actively to restore democracy when it is imperiled in member states. The Organization of African Unity, also a traditional diplomatic group, is attempting to forge a regional human rights code modeled after the Helsinki process in Europe.
Ответ:
The content and meaning of the law will be fair.
Explanation:
Due Process of law, as guaranteed in the Fifth Amendment, is the law that states that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property. It states that the law will remain fair and equal to both the civil and criminal in all legal matters.
Under the Fourteenth Amendment, Due Process of law is broken into two categories: Procedural Due Process and Substantive Due Process.
The Substantive due process deals with the subjects such as privacy and liberty of contract. The Substantive due process restricts the ability of the government to breach the constitutional liberties. It suggests that the substantive due process guarantees that the law will be fair in its content and meaning.
So, the last option is correct.