![pinapunapula](/avatars/49602.jpg)
pinapunapula
08.02.2022 •
History
In what ways could whites in the South justify imposing Jim Crow laws despite The Declaration of Independence declaring “all men are created equal?”
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- S Style and Beauty How to Make Your Lips Fuller? Ideas and Tips for Beautiful Lips...
- C Computers and Internet How to Learn to Type Fast?...
- A Art and Culture Who Said The Less We Love a Woman, the More She Likes Us ?...
- F Family and Home Parents or Environment: Who Has the Most Influence on a Child s Upbringing?...
- H Health and Medicine Is it true that working with a computer is harmful to your eyesight?...
- H Health and Medicine Boosting Immunity: A Complete Guide on How to Improve Your Body’s Natural Defenses...
- P Philosophy Unidentified Flying Object - What is the Nature of this Phenomenon?...
- C Computers and Internet How to Teach Older Generations to Work with Computers?...
- G Goods and services How to Choose a Coffee Maker? The Ultimate Guide for Coffee Lovers...
- C Computers and Internet Porn Banner: What It Is and How to Get Rid Of It?...
Answers on questions: History
- H History Which sentence from the article BEST develops a central idea? Even before the Civil War, in 1850 a New York company constructed the Panama Railroad, which was the world...
- E English Write a summary navigating social network...
- B Biology Fast.. what are some real world examples for 3 mutations (base substitution, deletions, insertions)...
- M Mathematics Write an equation that is perpendicular to 3r - 5y = 5 and passes through the point (9, -14)....
- M Mathematics In ΔIJK, k = 76 cm, i = 62 cm and ∠J=84°. Find the length of j, to the nearest centimeter....
Ответ:
When the Continental Congress adopted the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776, it was a call for the right to statehood rather than individual liberties, says Stanford historian Jack Rakove. Only after the American Revolution did people interpret it as a promise for individual equality. On July 4, 1776, when the Continental Congress adopted the historic text drafted by Thomas Jefferson, they did not intend it to mean individual equality. Rather, what they declared was that American colonists, as a people, had the same rights to self-government as other nations. Because they possessed this fundamental right, Rakove said, they could establish new governments within each of the states and collectively assume their “separate and equal station” with other nations. It was only in the decades after the American Revolutionary War that the phrase acquired its compelling reputation as a statement of individual equality.
Here, Rakove reflects on this history and how now, in a time of heightened scrutiny of the country’s founders and the legacy of slavery and racial injustices they perpetuated, Americans can better understand the limitations and failings of their past governments.
Rakove is the William Robertson Coe Professor of History and American Studies and professor of political science, emeritus, in the School of Humanities and Sciences. His book, Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution (1996), won the Pulitzer Prize in History. His new book, Beyond Belief, Beyond Conscience: The Radical Significance of the Free Exercise of Religion will be published next month.
With the U.S. confronting its history of systemic racism, are there any problems that Americans are reckoning with today that can be traced back to the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution?
I view the Declaration as a point of departure and a promise, and the Constitution as a set of commitments that had lasting consequences – some troubling, others transformative. The Declaration, in its remarkable concision, gives us self-evident truths that form the premises of the right to revolution and the capacity to create new governments resting on popular consent. The original Constitution, by contrast, involved a set of political commitments that recognized the legal status of slavery within the states and made the federal government partially responsible for upholding “the peculiar institution.” As my late colleague Don Fehrenbacher argued, the Constitution was deeply implicated in establishing “a slaveholders’ republic” that protected slavery in complex ways down to 1861.
But the Reconstruction amendments of 1865-1870 marked a second constitutional founding that rested on other premises. Together they made a broader definition of equality part of the constitutional order, and they gave the national government an effective basis for challenging racial inequalities within the states. It sadly took far too long for the Second Reconstruction of the 1960s to implement that commitment, but when it did, it was a fulfillment of the original vision of the 1860s. As people critically examine the country’s founding history, what might they be surprised to learn from your research that can inform their understanding of American history today? Two things. First, the toughest question we face in thinking about the nation’s founding pivots on whether the slaveholding South should have been part of it or not. If you think it should have been, it is difficult to imagine how the framers of the Constitution could have attained that end without making some set of “compromises” accepting the legal existence of slavery. When we discuss the Constitutional Convention, we often praise the compromise giving each state an equal vote in the Senate, and condemn the Three Fifths Clause allowing the southern states to count their slaves for purposes of political representation. But where the quarrel between large and small states had nothing to do with the lasting interests of citizens – you never vote on the basis of the size of the state in which you live – slavery was a real and persisting interest that one had to accommodate for the Union to survive. Second, the greatest tragedy of American constitutional history was not the failure of the framers to eliminate slavery in 1787. That option was simply not available to them. The real tragedy was the failure of Reconstruction and the ensuing emergence of Jim Crow segregation in the late 19th century that took many decades to overturn. That was the great constitutional opportunity that Americans failed to grasp, perhaps because four years of Civil War and a decade of the military occupation of the South simply exhausted Northern public opinion. Even now, if you look at issues of voter suppression, we are still wrestling with its consequences.
Explanation:
Ответ:
Que?
Explanation: