In which case did the supreme court rule that in addition to the suspicion required to justify a stop, the officer must have reasonable suspicion that the person stopped is "armed" and "dangerous" before a frisk can be conducted? a. adams v. williams b. bradford v. ray c. payton v. new york d. terry v. ohio?

the answer is d. terry v. ohio. hope this and good luck on your assignment!

NATO's essential and enduring purpose is to safeguard the freedom and security of all its members by political and military means. Collective defence is at the heart of the Alliance and creates a spirit of solidarity and cohesion among its members.