![Tweektweak](/avatars/38545.jpg)
Tweektweak
03.02.2020 •
History
Mr. johnson challenged his students to see which group could dissolve the salt fastest in a 100 ml of water the students could change any variables except the volume water used. group 1 change the water temperature they used top water at 22 celsius and then other temperatures: 32, 42, and 52 celsius they did not stir the mixture and they kept the volume of the water constant, jus just like mr. johnson directed. the salt dissolved the fastest in the warmest water. in their conclusions,group 1 wanted to include a line graph of their data
what label (s) should they place on the x axis
a) rate of dissolving
b) volume of water used
c) time to dissolve (sec)
d) temperatures of water ( celsius)
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- S Style and Beauty What Peeling is Suitable for Sensitive Skin?...
- A Auto and Moto What Is the Cost of Customs Clearance for a Car in Russia?...
- L Leisure and Entertainment Should You Buy a Ceramic Knife?...
- C Computers and Internet How to easily and quickly disable Firebug in Gmail and Google Docs...
- G Goods and services How to sew a ribbon: Tips for beginners...
- F Food and Cooking How to Make Mayonnaise at Home? Secrets of Homemade Mayonnaise...
- C Computers and Internet Which Phone is Best for Internet Surfing?...
- F Food and Cooking Everything You Need to Know About Pasta...
- C Computers and Internet How to Choose a Monitor?...
- H Horoscopes, Magic, Divination Where Did Tarot Cards Come From?...
Answers on questions: History
- B Biology Aseismic station recorded the arrival of a p wave at 10: 00: 00 am.the s-wave arrival was recorded at 10: 04: 20 am.what is the approximate distance between the earthquake...
- P Physics Show the relation of mechanical advantage velocity ratio and efficiency of a simple machine...
- H Health Looking for a friend that can talk on google hang outs...
- H History Can y all go follow my Instagram pleaseee 1.cshamoun...
Ответ:
Grutter v. Bollinger
Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) was a landmark case in which the Supreme Court upheld that the affirmative action admissions policy of the University of Michigan Law School was constitutional, as the school had a compelling interest in promoting diversity.
It also argued that the system was not equivalent to a quota system (which would have been unconstitutional) as it favoured underrepresented minority groups but also took into account many other factors on an individual basis.