pearl264
pearl264
15.07.2021 • 
History

Question 16 of 27 Read this excerpt from the Supreme Court's Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
dissenting opinion:
The state educator's undeniable, and undeniably vital,
mandate to ſteach] moral and political values is not a
general warrant to act as "thought police“ stifling
discussion of all but state-approved topics. ... Official
censorship of student speech on the ground that it
addresses "potentially sensitive topics" is..
impermissible. 4
The reasoning in this opinion is most similar to the reasoning in which other
Supreme Court ruling?

Solved
Show answers

Ask an AI advisor a question