![savannahwonder](/avatars/39435.jpg)
savannahwonder
27.07.2019 •
History
The immigration reform act of 1965 select one: a. decreased the quotas set in 1924 b. increased the quotas set in 1924, and european immigration skyrocketed incorrect c. was forced through congress in response to increasing numbers of vietnamese refugees d. increased the quotas set in 1924, and european immigration decreased
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- O Other How to Accidentally Get a Rare Coin with Your Change and How to Know Its Value?...
- S Society and Politics How Could Nobody Know About the Dead Mountaineers?...
- D Dating, Love, Relationships Why do we feel shame?...
- F Family and Home Why Does God Punish Us Constantly and How Can We Fix It?...
- F Family and Home Do Lullabies Help Babies Sleep or Is it Just a Myth?...
- B Business and Finance How to Get Your Money Back When Lending? Top 7 Ways...
- S Society and Politics Выборы: Смысл, Значение и Отражение...
- D Dating, Love, Relationships Why Should the Man be Active and the Woman Passive during Foreplay?...
- P Philosophy How did the concept of module arise in computer science?...
- S Society and Politics Why are thugs called gopniks ? A fascinating journey through Russian subculture...
Answers on questions: History
- H History After an oil spill shut it down, california s surf city usa reopened earlier than expected. Which city is it?....
- H History What was the reichstag fire decree?...
- H History 3. Which biological organisms that travelled from the Americas to Afro-Eurasia had the largest long-term effect? Explain why....
- E English What is the festival???...
- B Business Which best describes what is represented in the business cycle model? the interactions between producers and consumers the change in production cost macroeconomic trends...
- M Mathematics How can u tell that 7.360 and 7.36 are equivalent decimals...
- B Business The various types of bankruptcy relief include Chapter , reorganization of an individual s debts, and Chapter 15, recognition of insolvency proceedings pending in a foreign...
Ответ:
Ответ:
Explanation:
Japan has struggled with the legacies of its imperial aggression for decades.[1] Neither domestically nor internationally has the nation been able to find a formula which would put the so-called “history problem” behind it. Germany, in contrast, seems to have been very successful at confronting the problem of the Nazi past. Its neighbors do not fear the country and the “German problem”—once Europe’s biggest worry—no longer defines the geopolitics of the region. Why is this the case? And why do we observe the differences in how the two nations approached their aggressive histories? The answer usually goes something like this: “Germans have honestly reflected on their past, apologized for it, and paid their dues. The Japanese have not.” From this a prescription typically follows: if reconciliation is to take place in East Asia, Japan needs to be more like Germany.
I do not object to German-Japanese analogies and the discussion of their memory cultures in principle. Neither do I disagree with the efforts to push Japan to better address its legacies of rampant militarism. Yet, I find that much of the current German-Japanese comparative discourse operates on assumptions that are unwarranted.[2] In my view, this leads to gross oversimplifications. The purpose of this essay is to point out some of these problems, and to offer a few thoughts on how Germany and Japan can be compared, and where such comparisons reach their useful limits.