The International Court of Justice ruled that the Srebrenica massacre constituted genocide but did not place responsibility for the act on the Serbian nation. Which does this ruling
accomplish?
A) It prevents anyone from being held responsible for the Srebrenica massacre.
B) It prevents the Bosnians from commemorating the loss of their loved ones.
C) It prevents survivors from suing the country for reparations.
D) It allows the United States to investigate and pursue those responsible.
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- S Society and Politics Will Japan become Russia s Military Enemy?...
- P Philosophy Is Everything We Strive for Eventually Achieved and Destroyed?...
- S Society and Politics Understanding Politics and Its Role in the Development of Civilization...
- P Philosophy Why Did God Create Man and Place Him in Obscurity?...
- S Society and Politics Skoptsy: Who They Are and How They Perform Castration?...
- O Other Childhood Fears: What Many of Us Experienced...
- P Philosophy What is Something for you?...
- H Health and Medicine Why Do Humans Have One Heart?...
- P Philosophy Unbelievable stories of encounters with otherworldly forces...
- O Other How to Accidentally Get a Rare Coin with Your Change and How to Know Its Value?...
Answers on questions: History
- H History What was Tecumseh’s main goal in working with the British? A.) to divide the attention of American soldiers B.)to draw the United States into the War of 1812 C.)to ensure access...
- H History What kind of citizen would Stalin want in his totalitarian nation...
- H History In what ways did reform movement benefits from the contribution of both men and women...
- H History The cold war was based on two opposing ideologies; two ideas for how people should live and how governments should rule. these ideologies were and...
- H History How did the tariffs controversy expose sectional differences between the north and south? 1. the north manufactured goods to sell mainly in the united states, while the south...
- H History Which groups of people contributed to fall of the western roman empire? britons, egyptians, greeks, huns, vandals, visigoths...
- H History What are the five pillars of islam...
- H History George Washington Carver was born in the state of and was sickly as a ....
- H History You can still see where the city of Berlin was divided today why is that?...
- H History What did hegel mean when he said that shakespeare put thesis and antithesis into a single character?...
Ответ:
ang sagot ko ay letter C i choose that but im not sure that is correct
Ответ:
1933: New Deal / cooperative federalism / marble cake federalism cause a change in the makeup of the power balance between local, state and national goverment in the following way
Explanation:
The United States moved from dual federalism to cooperative federalism in the 1930s. National programs would increase the size of the national government and may not be the most effective in local environments. Cooperative federalism does not apply to the Judicial branch of the government.Each level of government is dominant within its own sphere. ... Marble cake federalism – Conceives of federalism as a marble cake in which all levels of government are involved in a variety of issues and programs, rather than a layer cake, or dual federalism, with fixed divisions between layers or levels of government.As a theory, dual federalism holds that the federal and state governments both have power over individuals but that power is limited to separate and distinct spheres of authority, and each government is neither subordinate to nor liable to be deprived of its authority by the other.The first, dual federalism, holds that the federal government and the state governments are co-equals, each sovereign. In this theory, parts of the Constitution are interpreted very narrowly, such as the 10th Amendment, the Supremacy Clause, the Necessary and Proper Clause, and the Commerce ClauseThe advantages of this system are that it protects local areas and jurisdictions from the overreach of the federal government. The framers of the Constitution were afraid that the federal government would have too much power, and this system was a means of preventing that situation from developing.Historically, the definitive example of dual federalism is the United States. ... These states can check the federal government through judicial action. Europe, too, has a system of dual federalism, albeit set up with state traditions. The European Union (EU) is organized into a federalist government with limited powers.