samyajones68
31.05.2020 •
History
What critique of U.S. economic policy is this protestor's sign making?
NO WTO1
REAL DEVELOPMENT,
NOT EXPLOITATION
O A. International economic development agencies harm poorer
nations by encouraging them to serve as exporters to wealthier
nations.
B. Wealthy nations should not be forced to contribute to nations that
are economically less successful.
O c. The WTO is a corrupt organization that only serves to enrich its
leaders.
O D. Economic activity is environmentally damaging because it takes
too much energy to ship goods around the globe.
PREVIOUS
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- L Leisure and Entertainment How to Choose a Program for Cutting Music?...
- A Auto and Moto How to choose the right drive for your BMW...
- L Leisure and Entertainment How to Choose the Perfect Gift for Men on February 23rd?...
- H Health and Medicine How to Treat Whooping Cough in Children?...
- H Health and Medicine Simple Ways to Lower Cholesterol in the Blood: Tips and Tricks...
- O Other How to Choose the Best Answer to Your Question on The Grand Question ?...
- L Leisure and Entertainment History of International Women s Day: When Did the Celebration of March 8th Begin?...
- S Style and Beauty Intimate Haircut: The Reasons, Popularity, and Risks...
- A Art and Culture When Will Eurovision 2011 Take Place?...
- S Style and Beauty How to Choose the Perfect Hair Straightener?...
Answers on questions: History
- P Physics The graphs answers. I don t get it very much...
- C Chemistry What is the charge of an electron?...
- M Mathematics Tamara invested $15,000 in an account that pays 4% annual simple interest. tamara will not make any additional deposits or withdrawals. how much interest will tamara...
- E English My favorite place i want to visit...
Ответ:
Its answer is A
Explanation:
Ответ:
I. Introduction
In the 1760s, Benjamin Rush, a native of Philadelphia, recounted a visit to Parliament. Upon seeing the king’s throne in the House of Lords, Rush said he “felt as if he walked on sacred ground” with “emotions that I cannot describe.”1 Throughout the eighteenth century, colonists had developed significant emotional ties with both the British monarchy and the British constitution. The British North American colonists had just helped to win a world war and most, like Rush, had never been more proud to be British. And yet, in a little over a decade, those same colonists would declare their independence and break away from the British Empire. Seen from 1763, nothing would have seemed as improbable as the American Revolution.
The Revolution built institutions and codified the language and ideas that still define Americans’ image of themselves. Moreover, revolutionaries justified their new nation with radical new ideals that changed the course of history and sparked a global “age of revolution.” But the Revolution was as paradoxical as it was unpredictable. A revolution fought in the name of liberty allowed slavery to persist. Resistance to centralized authority tied disparate colonies ever closer together under new governments. The revolution created politicians eager to foster republican selflessness and protect the public good but also encouraged individual self-interest and personal gain. The “founding fathers” instigated and fought a revolution to secure independence from Britain, but they did not fight that revolution to create a “democracy.” To successfully rebel against Britain, however, required more than a few dozen “founding fathers.” Common colonists joined the fight, unleashing popular forces that shaped the Revolution itself, often in ways not welcomed by elite leaders. But once unleashed, these popular forces continued to shape the new nation and indeed the rest of American history.
http://www.americanyawp.com/text/05-the-american-revolution/