asiababbie33
07.05.2020 •
History
What is not a reason for Hitler becoming chancellor in 1933?
Choose 1
Choose 1
(Choice A)
A
Nazis increasing popularity in parliamentary elections in the early 1930s.
(Choice B)
B
Nazis securing a majority of parliamentary seats in the election of 1932
(Choice C)
C
Hitler's strong showing in the 1932 presidential election
(Choice D)
D
President Hindenburg having the power to appoint a Chancellor and cabinet that doesn't necessarily represent a majority in parliament
(Choice E)
E
Hindenburg being coaxed into appointing Hitler chancellor in the hope that it would catalyze a stronger coalition in parliament
Solved
Show answers
More tips
Answers on questions: History
- H History The renaissance increased the value of the individual which is called what?...
- H History What kind of document is the athenian constitution? what was its purpose?...
- H History Which naval force kept general cornwallis and his troops from escaping yorktown?...
- H History It does not reguier a majority to prevail, but rather an inrate tireless minority keen to set brush fires in peoples minds.-samuel adams. how did samual adams act to thos idea.a....
- H History How did zhou claim the rights to china...
- H History How many total states were there in 1820...
- H History Read the thesis statement from an argumentative essay about the importance of National Parks to the economy. National parks are very influential role in the economy of the...
- H History Plato s famous teacher was who?...
- H History What is true of extended families?...
- H History What was true about the career of Richard Nixon? O A. He sought better relations with Communist citizens of the United States. O B. He earned a reputation for supporting openness...
Ответ:
i would go with C Hitler's strong showing in the 1932 presidential election
Ответ:
When considering Job's friend's approach, first, one must take into account Job's current situation. He had lost all of his sons, his wealth, his health, and probably the respect of others around him and his friends did little or nothing to ease his pain. For example, when trying to comfort him, Bildad, said that if Job's son died, its because they were sinners or evil men and they deserved to die. Eliphaz hinted that Job was not a righteous man, and he was being punished by God, who doesn't value the good actions of his servants.
When reading their full speech, one can see how they not only failed to ease Job's suffering, but also contributed to increase it. Blaming him from his suffering, blaming god, or insinuating that god was cruel. A god that Job deeply believed in. If one could say that they did at least something right is that they stopped Job from feeling sorry of himself. And when the last of his friends Elihu stepped in he helped him to see the bigger picture. And how he could still be a good man, and be suffering, because he was not perfect, and he could make mistakes.
A better approach could have been starting with kind words, feeling truly sorry for his loss, helping him to see that his sons had no blame in what happened, and that god could still be there to support him. And when the time was right, help him to stop feeling sorry of himself, in a kind but strong way, as Elihu did.