what was the significance of the supreme court's ruling in the maybury vs. madison case?
a) the ruling determined that congress could act against the president if it wished.
b) the ruling determined that the supreme court was more powerful than the president.
c) the ruling determined that laws that violated the u.s. constitution could be thrown out.
d) the ruling determined that presidents could not remove judges appointed by their predecessor.
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- A Art and Culture Who Said The Less We Love a Woman, the More She Likes Us ?...
- F Family and Home Parents or Environment: Who Has the Most Influence on a Child s Upbringing?...
- H Health and Medicine Is it true that working with a computer is harmful to your eyesight?...
- H Health and Medicine Boosting Immunity: A Complete Guide on How to Improve Your Body’s Natural Defenses...
- P Philosophy Unidentified Flying Object - What is the Nature of this Phenomenon?...
- C Computers and Internet How to Teach Older Generations to Work with Computers?...
- G Goods and services How to Choose a Coffee Maker? The Ultimate Guide for Coffee Lovers...
- C Computers and Internet Porn Banner: What It Is and How to Get Rid Of It?...
- F Food and Cooking How many stages of coffee roasting are there?...
- F Food and Cooking From Latte to Espresso: Which Coffee Drink is the Most Popular on Earth?...
Answers on questions: History
- H History Which term relates to control over the action of others...
- H History What was one provision of the immigration reform and control act of 1986?...
- H History What happened on sunday, april 9, 1865 at appomattox court house, virginia?...
- H History An army of private citizens....
- H History Read the excerpt from “Fish Cheeks.” Then my father poked his chopsticks just below the fish eye and plucked out the soft meat. “Amy, your favorite,” he said, offering...
- H History Why was land valued more than money during the middle ages...
- H History What were the us and the soviet unions roles in the arms race?...
- H History Aryans in europe were often called...
- H History How did the abbasid dynasty differ from the umayyad dynasty?...
- H History From the bill of rights, us constitution amendment i congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or...
Ответ:
The correct answer is C. The Supreme Court's ruling in Marbury v. Madison determined that laws that violated the U.S. Constitution could be thrown out.
Explanation:
Marbury v. Madison was a judicial case resolved by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1803. It arose as a result of a political dispute following the presidential elections of 1800, in which Thomas Jefferson, who was a Democratic Republican, defeated then-President John Adams, who was a federalist. In the last days of the outgoing government of Adams, the Congress, dominated by the federalists, established a series of judicial positions, among them 42 justices the of peace for the District of Columbia. The Senate confirmed the appointments, the president signed them and the Secretary of State was in charge of sealing and delivering the appointment documents. In the last-minute hustle and bustle, the outgoing secretary of state did not deliver the minutes of appointment to four justices of the peace, including William Marbury.
The new secretary of state under President Jefferson, James Madison, refused to deliver the minutes of appointment as the new government was irritated by the maneuver of the federalists of trying to secure control of the judiciary with the appointment of members of their party just before ceasing in government. However, Marbury appealed to the Supreme Court to order Madison to deliver his record.
If the Court ruled in favor of Marbury, Madison could still refuse to deliver the record and the Supreme Court would have no way to enforce the order. If the Court ruled against Marbury, it risked submitting the judiciary to Jefferson's supporters by allowing them to deny Marbury the position he could legally claim. Chief Justice John Marshall resolved this dilemma by deciding that the Supreme Court was not empowered to settle this case. Marshall ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act, which granted the Court these powers, was unconstitutional because it extended the original jurisdiction of the Court to the jurisdiction defined by the Constitution itself. Having decided not to intervene in this particular case, the Supreme Court secured its position as final arbiter of the law.
Ответ:
they work in some type of way