ayoismeisalex
02.02.2021 •
History
Why should Andrew Jackson be on the $20 bill?
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- P Philosophy Is Everything We Strive for Eventually Achieved and Destroyed?...
- S Society and Politics Understanding Politics and Its Role in the Development of Civilization...
- P Philosophy Why Did God Create Man and Place Him in Obscurity?...
- S Society and Politics Skoptsy: Who They Are and How They Perform Castration?...
- O Other Childhood Fears: What Many of Us Experienced...
- P Philosophy What is Something for you?...
- H Health and Medicine Why Do Humans Have One Heart?...
- P Philosophy Unbelievable stories of encounters with otherworldly forces...
- O Other How to Accidentally Get a Rare Coin with Your Change and How to Know Its Value?...
- S Society and Politics How Could Nobody Know About the Dead Mountaineers?...
Answers on questions: History
- M Mathematics What is x for 2(x-4)=4...
- M Mathematics What is the total number of students at audubon high school and rivers elementary...
- S Social Studies Juanita was very upset and distraught at her father s funeral. as his coffin was being lowered into the grave she suddenly experienced heart palpitations, dizziness, and the...
- M Mathematics Which equation is the inverse of y = 100 – x2? y= + or - sqrt 100-x y= 10 + or - sqrt x y= 100 + or - sqrt x y = + or - sqrt x - 100...
- M Mathematics Maria, a color specialist, mixes 2 parts of white and 13 parts of red to develop a particular shade. if she creates 150 liters of the shade, what volume of white color did...
Ответ:
because
Explanation:
he found the democratic party and he supported individual liberty.
Ответ:
plessy v. ferguson was a landmark 1896 u.s. supreme court decision that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the “separate but equal” doctrine. the case stemmed from an 1892 incident in which african-american train passenger homer plessy refused to sit in a car for blacks. rejecting plessy’s argument that his constitutional rights were violated, the supreme court ruled that a law that “implies merely a legal distinction” between whites and blacks was not unconstitutional. as a result, restrictive jim crow legislation and separate public accommodations based on race became commonplace.