kingbot350
kingbot350
29.11.2019 • 
Mathematics

Abiology student who created a regression model to use a bird's height when perched for predicting its wingspan made these two statements. assuming the calculations were done correctly, explain what is wrong with each interpretation.
a. an r2 of 93% shows that this linear model is appropriate.
b. a bird 10 inches tall will have a wingspan of 17 inches.
a) choose the correct choice below.
a. r2 is an indication of the nonlinearity of the model, not the appropriateness of the model. a regression line is the indicator of an appropriate model.
b. r2 is an indication of the nonlinearity of the model, not the appropriateness of the model. a scattered residuals plot is the indicator of an appropriate model.
c. r2 is an indication of the strength of the model, not the appropriateness of the model. a scattered residuals plot is the indicator of an appropriate model.
d. r2 is an indication of the strength of the model, not the appropriateness of the model. a regression line is the indicator of an appropriate model.
b) choose the correct choice below.
a. regression models give predictions, not actual values. the student should have said, "the model predicts that a bird 10 inches tall is expected to have a wingspan of 17 inches."
b. regression models give averages, not actual values. the student should have said, "a bird 10 inches tall will, on average, have a wingspan of 17 inches."
c. regression models give probabilities, not actual values. the student should have said, "a bird 10 inches tall will probably have a wingspan of 17 inches."
d. regression models give actual values, but the student should have said, "the model states that a bird 10 inches tall will have a wingspan of 17 inches."

Solved
Show answers

Ask an AI advisor a question