skyemichellec

20.12.2019 • 

Mathematics

Alocation analysis has been narrowed down to two locations, akron and boston. the main factors in the decision will be the supply of raw materials, which has a weight of .50, transportation cost, which has a weight of .40, and labor cost, which has a weight of .10. the scores for raw materials, transportation, and labor are for akron 60, 80, and 70, respectively; for boston 70, 50, and 90, respectively. given this information and a minimum acceptable composite score of 75, we can say that the manager should:

be indifferent between these locations
choose akron
choose boston
reject both locations

build a plant in both cities

Ответ:

yayamcneal05

13.01.2022

Mathematics

---

reject both locations

Step-by-step explanation:

The composite score for Akron is:

Since a composite score of 75 is required, Akron should be rejected.

The composite score for Boston is:

Boston also has a composite score below 75, so it should also be rejected.

The correct answer is:

reject both locations

---

0,0(0 оценок)

Ответ:

michaelchavez6959127

20.10.2022

Mathematics

---

Alright, let's take an example. 1 is less than 2, so we can write it as 1<2. However, if we multiplied both sides by -1 without changing anything else, we get -1<-2, but -1 is greater than -2 because it is less negative, so the correct way of writing it would be -1>-2. Therefore, since a number that is less positive than another becomes less negative (and therefore higher) when both are multiplied by -1, we have to change the side of the inequality

---

0,0(0 оценок)