xojade
19.04.2021 •
Mathematics
How to outline a proof
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- H Health and Medicine Angina: Causes, Symptoms, and Treatment...
- C Computers and Internet How to Learn to Type Fast?...
- F Food and Cooking Delight for Gourmets: How to Prepare Liver Pate...
- S Style and Beauty How to braid friendship bracelets?...
- H Health and Medicine Mercury Thermometer Danger: What to do when a thermometer breaks?...
- F Food and Cooking Which Calamari Salad is the Most Delicious?...
- S Society and Politics 10 Tips for Boosting Your Self-Esteem...
- F Food and Cooking The Most Delicious and Simple Fish in Batter Recipe...
- H Health and Medicine What is Autism? Understanding the Basics of This Neurodevelopmental Disorder...
- P Philosophy How to Develop Extrasensory Abilities?...
Answers on questions: Mathematics
- M Mathematics How many fish and reptile pets are in the untied states all together? Estimates show that there are 1.4 times 10^2 pet fish and 9.4 times 10^6 pet reptiles in the untied states....
- M Mathematics 6th grade math i mark as brainliest...
- M Mathematics Which transformation would accomplish this? A translation 3 units left and 2 units up A translation 3 units right and 2 units down A translation 2 units left and 3 units up A...
- M Mathematics Biased six sided die is tossed. The outcomes with their probabilities are listed on the table on the right. For this probability distribution, mean is 4.2 , variance is 1 , and...
- M Mathematics DVD cases are sold in packages of 2. Padded mailing envelopes are sold in packets of 8. What is the least number of cases and envolopes you could buy so that there is one case...
- M Mathematics 10pts and I’ll mark brainliest! (Also EXPLAIN the reasoning you used to write the expression)...
- M Mathematics The graph of f(x)=-vx is shifted to the right five units. What is the domain?...
- M Mathematics A house on the market was valued at 238,000. After several years, the value decreased by 15% . By how much did the house s value decrease in dollars? What is the current value...
- M Mathematics Please answer see the image...
- M Mathematics Divide 40 into the ratio 9:1...
Ответ:
Write out the beginning very carefully. Write down the definitions very explicitly, write down the things you are allowed to assume, and write it all down in careful mathematical language. Write out the end very carefully. That is, write down the thing you're trying to prove, in careful mathematical language.
Step-by-step explanation:
CarryOnLerning
MarkAsBrainliest Please
Ответ:
Proposition: Let
S
be a closed subset of a complete metric space (,)
(
E
,
d
)
. Then the metric space (,)
(
S
,
d
)
is complete.
Proof Outline: Cauchy sequences in (,)
(
S
,
d
)
converge in (,)
(
E
,
d
)
by completeness, and since (,)
(
S
,
d
)
is closed, convergent sequences of points in (,)
(
S
,
d
)
converge in (,)
(
S
,
d
)
, so any Cauchy sequence of points in (,)
(
S
,
d
)
must converge in (,)
(
S
,
d
)
.
Proof: Let ()
(
a
n
)
be a Cauchy sequence in (,)
(
S
,
d
)
. Then each ∈
a
n
∈
E
since ⊆
S
⊆
E
, so we may treat ()
(
a
n
)
as a sequence in (,)
(
E
,
d
)
. By completeness of (,)
(
E
,
d
)
, →
a
n
→
a
for some point ∈
a
∈
E
. Since
S
is closed,
S
contains all of its limit points, implying that any convergent sequence of points of
S
must converge to a point of
S
. This shows that ∈
a
∈
S
, and so we see that →∈
a
n
→
a
∈
S
. As ()
(
a
n
)
was arbitrary, we see that Cauchy sequences in (,)
(
S
,
d
)
converge in (,)
(
S
,
d
)
, which is what we wanted to show.
The main difference here is the level of detail in the proofs. In the outline, we left out most of the details that are intuitively clear, providing the main idea so that a reader could fill in the details for themselves. In the actual proof, we go through the trouble of providing the more subtle details to make the argument more rigorous - ideally, a reader of a more complete proof should not be left wondering about any gaps in logic.
(There is another type of proof called a formal proof, in which everything is derived from first principles using mathematical logic. This type of proof is entirely rigorous but almost always very lengthy, so we typically sacrifice some rigor in favor of clarity.)
As you learn more about a topic, your proofs typically begin to approach proof outlines, since things that may not have seemed obvious before become intuitive and clear. When you are first learning it is best to go through the detailed proof to make sure that you understand everything as well as you think you do, and only once you have mastered a subject do you allow yourself to omit obvious details that should be clear to someone who understands the subject on the same level as you.
Ответ:
I hope this helps you! :)