Idon't understand this i think its a but i don't know
premises:
if two triangles are congruent, their corresponding angles are congruent.
△abc△abc and △qrs△qrs are not congruent.
conclusion:
the corresponding angles of △abc△abc and △qrs△qrs are not congruent.
which statement best describes this argument?
a. the argument is invalid because the premises are not true.
b. the argument is invalid because the conclusion does not follow the premises.
c. the argument is valid by the law of syllogism.
d. the argument is valid by the law of detachment.

In miles.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the car´s odometer, the measures are in miles, also distances at the road are measured on miles, what makes it the best way to report the distance driven.

However, this also depends on the place where the car is driven, in the USA we use miles, in Mexico, for example, the distances are measure on kilometer, in which case the mile has to be multiplied per 1.60 that is what a mile values on kilometers.

Many cars also getthe count of the total of miles driven, in which case what the driver has to do is subtract the total of miles at the end minus the miles that the car´s odometer had at the beggining of the journey.