Me (40 points) + brainliset answer don't steal my points

part a: i think that this is inaccurate since there is a strong positive correlation, and r = 0.01 would be a very weak correlation, almost none.

part b: i would say that the amount of farmers available compared to strawberries picked would be a causal relationship, since there would be more farmers to pick the strawberries.

step-by-step explanation:

for part a there is too low of a correlation in r = 0.01 to have any sort of correlation. however the graph has a strong correlation.

for part b just put any scenario where the x value would cause the y value (strawberries) to increase. make sure to differ this part from mine so the teacher won’t accuse u of copying!