chriscook4471

26.04.2020 • 

Mathematics

Premise 1: The defendant has no alibi for the night of the theft.
Premise 2: The stolen goods were found in the defendant's possession.
Premise 3: Two witnesses have identified the defendant as the thief.
Conclusion: The defendant is guilty of theft.
Decide whether the above argument is inductive or deductive.
tive.
Select an answer
If the above argument is inductive, decide if it is strong or weak. Select not applicable if the
argument is deductive.
Select an answer

Ответ:

harleygirl9451

03.04.2023

Mathematics

---

Step-by-step explanation:

f(4) = 42 + 5 =21, f(-10) = (-10)2 +5 = 105 or alternatively f: x → x2 + 5.

The phrase "y is a function of x" means that the value of y depends upon the value of x, so:

y can be written in terms of x (e.g. y = 3x ).

If f(x) = 3x, and y is a function of x (i.e. y = f(x) ), then the value of y when x is 4 is f(4), which is found by replacing x"s by 4"s .

If f(x) = 3x + 4, find f(5) and f(x + 1).

f(5) = 3(5) + 4 = 19

f(x + 1) = 3(x + 1) + 4 = 3x + 7

---

0,0(0 оценок)