Which statement best demonstrates why the following is a non-example of a polynomial? 33 over 16 − 62y2xz − 35z1/3y2 (2 points) the expression has a variable raised to a negative exponent. the expression has a variable in the denominator of a fraction. the expression has a negative coefficient. the expression has a variable raised to a fraction.

33 over 16 - 62y2xz - 35z1 / 3y2
 We rewrite the expression:
 (33/16) - 62 * (y ^ 2) * (x) * (z) - 35 * (z) * (1 / 3y ^ 2)
 The expression has a variable in the denominator of a fraction.
 In fact, if we look at the expression it has a variable, specifically y ^ 2 which is in the denominator of a fraction. This causes the expression to stop being a polynomial.
 
 The expression has a variable in the denominator of a fraction.

the area will increase 6073.51 ft

the circumference will increase 69.08 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

(22.5 * 3.14)^2=4991.4225 ft^2

67/2=33.5

(33.5*3.14)^2=11064.9361 ft^2

2(3.14*22.5)=141.3 ft

67/2=33.5

2(3.14*33.5)=210.38 ft