What is proposed as evidence that supports the big bang theory?

That's not the way it works.

Real scientists don't gather evidence to support a theory that they made up.

Real scientists build a theory to explain the evidence that they observed.

The so-called "Big Bang" theory is the best explanation ... so far ... of:

-- the observed Cosmic Background radiation,

-- the observed probable expansion of the universe (not "proved"),

-- the observed probable existence of "dark matter" (not "proved"),

-- the observed success of predictions that come from standard theories of fundamental particles, and

-- the observed success of predictions (like GPS) that come from Einstein's general theory of relativity.  

BUT ! If you come up with a better explanation tomorrow ... one that explains the observed evidence more accurately, and makes more accurate predictions of things that we can observe or test ... then the "Big Bang" theory will go out the window, and the scientific world will adopt the "Sid4067" theory for the same evidence that we already have.

The correct answer is transmission.

Explanation:

Sound is a form of energy. The energy that survives the transfer is called the sound transmission. If the energy gets absorb then the sound is not heard to the listener. In this case, the absorption will occur.

People are able to hear footsteps because the sound made by a foot hitting the floor travels through the air to reach their ears.  In this case, the sound transmission will occur as the footsteps can be heard. It means that the energy is transferred here.