![geg05](/avatars/23296.jpg)
geg05
21.01.2021 •
Social Studies
1. Apply your knowledge of stereotyping and social identity theory to explain what went wrong here. 2. What other perceptual errors are apparent in this case study
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- F Family and Home How to Choose the Best Diapers for Your Baby?...
- H Health and Medicine Headache: A Comprehensive Guide to Treatment...
- C Computers and Internet How to Properly Order Clothing from International Online Stores...
- A Auto and Moto Mastering One-Movement Parking: All You Need to Know...
- D Dating, Love, Relationships How Long Can Love Last?...
- S Society and Politics Is It Fact or Fiction? Let s Talk About Anton Chekhov s Pseudonym...
- F Food and Cooking How to Find Your Zip Code?...
- S Style and Beauty How to choose the best mascara for your eyelashes...
- S Style and Beauty How to Apply Foundation Correctly?...
- S Sport How to Choose Tennis Rackets?...
Answers on questions: Social Studies
- E English Imagine a world that is perfect in your eyes. Formulate a plan to create that world. As you write, consider the following questions: What is your passion? How does your personality...
- P Physics Arope vibrates every 0.5 s. what is the frequency of the waves?...
- M Mathematics Please help, its so simple...
- S Social Studies What does francis say about atticus how do his comments illustrate that racism exists not just in the other residents of maycomb but within the finch family as well?...
Ответ:
Answer is given below
Explanation:
As per Case study Hy Dairies, Inc.
1.
Stereotyping is the act of assigning traits to individuals based on their active participation in a social activity or theory. According to the theory of social identity, in order to increase their dominance and self-image, people in the group discriminate against people in the outside group.Gilman was very confident in assigning the job role of market research coordinator Rochelle Beauport because she felt that the new position she was given would help improve her experience and broaden her career. Surprisingly, Gilman was unaware of his self-concept.This can be understood from the facts of the case that Rochelle Beaufort enjoyed the job role of assistant brand manager. She made an impression that she was side by side and changed to a new character due to her colour2
Assessment of self-satisfaction: It states that a person’s behavior is tied to the expectations we make of him. Gilman's expectations about Beaufort's behavior are positive but in the end he thinks about leaving.Improper Consensus Impact: Like Gilman himself, Beauport felt that he would accept a job because of the similarity between its features, which eventually proved to be wrong. Thus, he assessed Beauport's personal characteristics and values.Ответ:
don't understanding .
.
.
...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.