![ijohnh14](/avatars/15673.jpg)
ijohnh14
20.01.2022 •
Social Studies
According to Salovey and Mayer (1990), emotional appraisal and emotional expression appear to present as related to , the ability to comprehend another's feelings and re-experience these feelings within one's self (to feel with another).
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- F Food and Cooking How to salt lard?...
- W Work and Career Can Skill Alone Make You a Professional?...
- C Computers and Internet How to Top Up Your Skype Account Without Losing Money?...
- P Philosophy Unidentified Flying Object - What is the Nature of this Phenomenon?...
- F Family and Home Protect Your Home or Apartment from Pesky Ants...
- O Other What is a Disk Emulsifier and How Does it Work?...
- F Family and Home What does a newborn need?...
- F Family and Home Choosing the Right Car Seat for Your Child: Tips and Recommendations...
- F Food and Cooking How to Get Reconfirmation of Registration?...
Answers on questions: Social Studies
- E English Write a text using the proverb: Money doesn t grow on trees....
- B Biology HELP! what is the alignment of the earth,moon and sun during a lunar eclipse?...
- E English After two weeks, the atmosphere changed. The wind stopped. The sand settled. During breaks, I polished my armor as best I could in anticipation of facing the dragon. We followed...
- E English One of the key questions for analyzing tone is: what emotions might the author have experienced while writing the text? true false...
Ответ:
Both Clifford and James have very different ideas about the subject of belief. In his essay The Ethics of Belief, Clifford argues that people have a responsibility to form their beliefs in a way that is reasonable and responsible, and that is based on evidence. He argues that beliefs are good or bad based on how they were formed, not on what the consequences of these are.
On the other hand, James argues in The Will to Believe that beliefs do not always have to come from cold facts and certainty. Sometimes, beliefs can also be influenced by feelings and passions. Moreover, what we believe in is not only a independent exercise, but one that is shaped by the social forces that surround us.
The two theories are in conflict with each other mainly where it concerns the origins of beliefs. While Clifford tends to support cold, hard facts, James allows for more subjectivity and practicality. I find that James's theory is more appealing to me and better suited to beliefs in a contemporary context. Nowadays, religion cannot exist in a vaccum. It has to be reconciled with many other areas of life, such as technology, education and our community. I believe that the theory that James puts forward is better equipped to deal with these pressures.