![DepressionCentral](/avatars/30021.jpg)
DepressionCentral
03.02.2020 •
Social Studies
As part of your morning routine you eat breakfast, drink a cup of coffee, take a shower, and walk your dog. which part of this routine is most likely controlled by the voice of the generalized other?
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- H Health and Medicine How to Calculate Your Ideal Weight?...
- S Style and Beauty Discover the Art of Nail Design: How Do You Paint Your Nails?...
- P Philosophy How to Develop Extrasensory Abilities?...
- O Other Everything You Need to Know About Kudyabliks...
- C Computers and Internet The Twitter Phenomenon: What it is and How to Use it...
- C Computers and Internet How to Choose a Laptop: Expert Guide and Tips...
- C Computers and Internet How to Choose a Monitor?...
- H Horoscopes, Magic, Divination Where Did Tarot Cards Come From?...
- S Style and Beauty How to Make Your Lips Fuller? Ideas and Tips for Beautiful Lips...
- C Computers and Internet How to Learn to Type Fast?...
Answers on questions: Social Studies
- F French Me when dream stans exist...
- C Chemistry The decomposition of sulfuryl chloride, so2cl2, to sulfur dioxide and chlorine gases is a first order reaction. it is found taht it takes 13.7 hours to decompose a 0.250 m so2cl2...
- M Mathematics How would you do this problem?...
- H History Amold forms when minerals replace all of the parts of an organism. true or false ,i need with this one...
Ответ:
Taking a shower
Explanation:
Taking a shower is the voice of the generalized other because everyone does take a shower or a greater percentage of people do but it's mot everyone that does the other options on a general note as taking a shower.
Ответ:
The correct option is B: could create their own Miranda warning if it communicated the same message
Explanation:
According to the Duckworth v. Eagan (1988), in which the convicted claimed that the Miranda warnings were not corrected stated, the Supreme Court held that it is not a must that Miranda warnings must be in the exact format as described in the Miranda, as long as it conveys the rights of a suspect to the individual, it is valid. The convict claimed that "if and when you go to court" as used by the police officer to him rendered the Miranda warning inadequate, but the Supreme Court ruled that it does not.