Historians reach for words like “revolution” and “world-historical” in describing big historical changes. Would you consider the movement from farms to cities, from colonial times to today, to be revolutionary? Why or why not?

Yes I would

Explanation:

This is since development has increased after such movements.. history has also acted on these changes. This was a Revolution in a manner as many improvements are also seen. While connecting the bridges of history and biological we can see that a great number of evolutions have come into being. hope this answer satisfies you

Because of the difference b/t a cabinet secretary acting according to the president's orders and acting as directed by the law.

Explanation: