How did developments in Dahlonega, Georgia, during the 1830s contribute to the removal of the Cherokee from their homelands in Georgia? A The discovery of gold in the region led many people to move to the state and attempt to settle Cherokee land. B Continued attacks on the Cherokee by settlers led many Cherokee leaders to support leaving their lands and heading west С. The growing popularity of Cherokee politicians in local governments led to calls for their removal from the region. D. Competition for limited factory jobs in the region led many settlers to call for the Cherokee to be forced to leave the state.​

Cherokee removal, part of the Trail of Tears, refers to the forced relocation between 1836 and 1839 of an estimated 16,000 members of the Cherokee Nation and 1,000-2,000 of their slaves; from their lands in Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Alabama to the Indian Territory (present day Oklahoma) in the then Western United States, and the resultant deaths along the way and at the end of the movement of an estimated 4,000 Cherokee and unknown number of slaves.

The Cherokee have come to call the event Nu na da ul tsun yi (the place where they cried); another term is Tlo va sa (our removal)—both phrases not used at the time, and seems to be of Choctaw origin. Removal actions (voluntary, reluctantly or forcibly) occurred to other American Indian groups in the American South, North, Midwest, Southwest, and the Plains regions. The Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, Cherokee and (Muskogee) were removed reluctantly. The Seminole in Florida resisted removal by the United States Army for decades (1817–1850) with guerrilla warfare, part of the intermittent Native American Wars that lasted from 1540 to 1924. Some Seminole remained in their Florida home country, while others were transported to Native American Territory in shackles.

The phrase "Trail of Tears" is used to refer to similar events endured by other Indian groups, especially among the "Five Civilized Tribes". The phrase originated as a description of the involuntary removal of the Choctaw Nation in 1831.[1]

Explanation:

No, actually the Prime Minister of Israel is the head of government of Israel and it's system of government is based on parliamentary democracy. This means that even the Prime Minister doesn't make all the decisions and rules for the country. This doesn't mean that Israel doesn't have a President, they do. Even though he has several important functions within the government, the President's role is considered ceremonial and apolitical. The government is divided in three powers, the Executive, the Legislative and the Judiciary, it's between these three powers that make all the decisions (along with the Prime Minister) in the country.