How were the views of france and the united kingdom similar at the end of world war i? they each planned to adopt president wilson’s fourteen points. they believed that germany needed to rebuild its economy. they were opposed to taking part in secret agreements. they wanted germany to be punished for the destruction caused during the war.

The way views of France and the United Kingdom similar at the end of World War I is: they wanted Germany to be punished for the destruction  caused during the war

This is why after wining the war, Germany was forced to pay for the expense that the Allies need to spend during the war. This decision brought Germany into a deep economic depression for decades. Hitler used this desperate situation  as a means to obtain support from Germany's citizens and start the world war II.

Even though they considered different types and ways of punishment, all they wanted germany to be punished for the destruction caused during the war.

Explanation:

First of all, the UK didn't agree with the 14 points o President Wilson. Then, only the UK and President Wilson believed germany needed to rebuild its economy, france didn't want them to recover, they actually wanted to charge them the expenses of the war and to divide them. Furthermore, the president of France wanted to crippled them and make them pay at all costs, even if he had to use all his influence in all kind of treaties, this includes secret agreements with other countries.  The only thing they had in common was that all them believed Germany was the guilty of the destruction caused in the war. Thus, they only agreed to punish germany, however they had very different perspectives about it.

This isn't really understood, because not all societies formed governments in the sense of western hierarchical systems, and not all governments formed under the same conditions. It is one of those mysteries, which means it was a gradual thing, and not a sudden seasonal change from anarchy to government. The first government accumulated within a group of people who spoke the same language, and there was some pressure on them that required some level of organization for the distribution of resources and labor, so it seems, but even as I write this I know that is far too simple.

For thousands of years it was believed there was a natural hegemony bestowed by divine power, then, there was the American Revolution and the idea of government was turned upside down. Following that was Karl Marx, who suggested that government was a mechanism of oppression to control the means of production and wealth accumulation, but all of the hypotheses built from this idea, which most of modern thinking can find some degree of lineage to, are problematic to be nice, and outright failures at the other extreme.

Quick answer is, there are a thousand answers, none of which have proven to be universal, so they are only partially right.

There is a lot of room for research in this area.