Kelly files a suit against Lewis in a state court. The case proceeds to trial, after which the court renders a verdict. The case is appealed to an appellate court. After its review of Kelly v. Lewis, the appellate court can?

Explanation:

The Appellate Court can  reverse, remand, affirm or modify the decision of the lower court, or parts of the decision after reviewing an appealed case from the lower court.This is done to ensure that the provisions of the Appellate Court as a court of appeals is maintained and exercised accordingly.

After an Appellate court issues reverse, remand, and affirm, the case will be tired again in the Court of Appeals as the decisions made by the lower courts would be dismissed through reverse. The court may also sometimes order the lower courts to hear the case again through the provisions of remand.

Through affirm, the Appellate courts establishes that decision made by the lower court remains unchanged.

Thomas Jefferson's natural rights were "Life, Liberty, and The Pursuit of Happiness" and referred to them as 'unalienable rights'

John Locke's natural rights were "Life, Liberty, and Property" and referred to them as 'The Laws of Nature"

Both works state that no man is superior or inferior to another and that these rights are the birthright of every human and cannot be taken away.