People who can take the same data, be logically consistent with it, and arrive at quite different answers to moral, ethical, or religious questions are said to have different

People who can take the same data, be logically consistent with it, and arrive at quite different answers to moral, ethical, or religious questions are said to have different:

Environmental worldviews

Explanation:

Environmental worldviews are those views that tell us that how people think about the working of world, how they fit in it as well as about the moral and ethical values. These views can be human centered, life centered, eco-centered or combination of these. The people who can take the same data, be logically consistent with it, and arrive at quite different answers to moral, ethical or religious questions have different environmental views because they are looking at the data with different perspectives.  

Environmental Worldviews

Explanation:

The above statement is based on a textbook by G. Tyler Miller, Living in the Environment, 14th Edition.

The differing views about just how severe the environmental concerns are and what we can do about them come mostly from different world views on the climate.

The environmental worldview is how you think the world operates, what you think your position must be in the world, and also what you think is right and what is wrong (environmental principles).

Individuals with vastly different world views of the environment will take the same data, be logically consistent, and come to quite different conclusions because they start with different assumptions and values.

I believe the answer is: operant conditioning

operant conditioning refers to the process of behavioural modification that occurs through the use of rewards or punishment. In timmy's case, the attention that he got is what considered to be the reward, and acting in a bizzare way is the behavioural modification that timmy felt to be working in order to get his reward.