What are the comparative strengths and weaknesses of the two hypotheses little mito?

The relative strengths and weaknesses of the two hypotheses are that there are ways that we could recreate the cell drinking the other little prokaryotic. The end symbiotic hypothesis are only dealing with mitochondria, chloroplast, and cilia/flagella development. It says not anything about the other organelles such as Golgi, ER, vacuoles, vesicles, Lysosomes, and the nuclear covering.

Generally, A strength is a resource or capability that an organization can put to good use in order to achieve its goals. Weakness in an organization is a constraint, flaw, or defect that prevents it from fulfilling its goals.

Explanation:

The autogenic hypothesis has the advantage of explaining the origins of the endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi apparatus, and nucleus. The endosymbiotic hypothesis has a flaw since it does not explain how those came to be. The endosymbiotic hypothesis has the advantage of explaining the origins of chloroplast and mitochondria.

For further information, see the following link:

link

ion even know folk i just need the points

Explanation: