Why is it a bad idea to assume that family preservation is always the best option? a. family preservation rarely works with single-parent families. b. most family social workers do not have the skills to a family using this method. c. family preservation is an outdated model of family services. d. leaving children in a violent family can put them at risk for abuse?

A careful reading of the history of the “idea” of family preservation as well as an appraisal of the recent policy context for its adoption—as illuminated by Berry (1997), Schorr (1997), McCroskey and Meezan (1997), and others—suggests that all three explanations—dissensus on values, practice lacunae, and organizational complexities—may to a degree be valid. At a minimum, these and other trenchant commentaries such as those provided recently by Littell and Schuerman (1999) and Halpern (1999) suggest that any discussion of the “practice” of family preservation absent its historical/valuative roots and current organizational and policy context will be incomplete.

That said, this present paper will focus on some of the most vexing challenges of implementing family preservation practice, some of its enduring legacies as a practice modality, and some of the longer range problems in developing practice theory and application that it has illuminated

A)By shoving her in the back,Bernard committed a battery.

Explanation:

Battery is a crime. This crime represents a situation where you hear some kind of illegal physical contact, without consent and with the intention of causing me some damage to the victim. We have an example of this crime in the question above, because when Bernard pushed Millie in the back, he made physical contact with the intention of hurting, that is, illegal physical contact.

Many people may mistake the battery for an assault, however the assault refers to physical contact in order to cause apprehension.