crystalbyrd79p8imrx

04.07.2019 • 

Biology

The laws of motion discovered in the 17th century were used to explain force, movement, and acceleration for decades. however, by 1905, there were a number of findings that could not be explained by those laws. which statement best describes the eventual outcome? a) the old laws of motion were discarded in favor of new ones. b) scientists realized the limitations of the scientific method. c) scientists formulated a new theory that elaborated on the original. d) all the calculations using the old theory were found to be incorrect.

Ответ:

gobertbrianna40

11.03.2022

Biology

---

Option C

Explanation:

Law of motion is a scientific law and like all other scientific laws it does not guarantee accurate explanations to natural phenomenon. Therefore, from time to time with new discoveries, these laws need to be refined in order to comply with new findings and discoveries.  

Therefore, when laws of motion could not explain the new findings it became essential to formulate a new theory based on the existing one.  

Thus, option C is correct

---

0,0(0 оценок)

Ответ:

kashbaby

17.10.2020

Biology

---

Political views clashed because of social-economic factors. The poor held the wealthy in contempt and thus chose the opposing political side. Usually the rich had one candidate they nominated in hopes of being included in the spoils system. The poor did not have this alternative to turn to since the spoils system was essentially for affluent individuals with political ties and/or blood relations. 

---

0,0(0 оценок)