![katelyn03anderson](/avatars/1149.jpg)
katelyn03anderson
03.07.2021 •
Business
the cost of quality has two components: the cost of good quality. the costs for good quality are the cost of monitoring and preventing defects. the cost of poor quality are often hidden, hitting customers and departments not immediately related to production. some experts argue that:
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- L Leisure and Entertainment Unlocking the Secrets of Winning the Lottery...
- S Style and Beauty Ultimate Guide on How to Care for Suede Shoes...
- S Sport Running: How to Do It Right?...
- F Food and Cooking How to Cook Spaghetti Right – Secrets and Tips...
- P Philosophy Personal attitude towards Confession: how to prepare and undergo the procedure correctly?...
- H Health and Medicine Flu: How to Recognize It by the First Symptoms?...
- F Food and Cooking How to Sober Up Quickly? Important Facts and Tips...
- H Health and Medicine How to Properly Take a Blood Sugar Test?...
- H Health and Medicine Simple and Effective: How to Get Rid of Cracked Heels...
- O Other How to Choose the Best Answer to Your Question on The Grand Question ?...
Answers on questions: Business
- H History Elaborate the statement below: • Heroes are made. They are a product of their time....
- H History What large river flows through northern india through the city of kanpur...
- C Chemistry Which answer below is not an indication that a chemical reaction has occurred?...
- M Mathematics Can someone help please ??...
Ответ:
Quality is never costless because monitoring and prevention have costs
Explanation:
The cost of quality has two parts which are the cost of prevention and the cost of failure. The cost of quality simply refers to the sum of the prevention cost and the cost of failure.
It should be noted that spending more on prevention helps in reducing the cost of failure. According to experts, quality is is never costless because monitoring and prevention have costs.
Ответ:
false
explanation: