jr928718

14.07.2019 • 

English

Been stuck on this for like an hour. which of the following is the best kind of resource for detailed information of a historical nature (at least two years old)? a. magazines b. encyclopedias c. books d. databases e. interviews which of the following would you consult if you wanted basic, brief information on a topic? a. magazines b. encyclopedias c. books d. databases e. interviews which of the following would be the best source of information for a speech on vietnam veterans in the local community? a. magazines b. encyclopedias c. books d. databases e. interviews

Ответ:

lanashanabJHsbd1099

13.03.2022

English

---

C. Books

B. Encyclopedias

E. Interviews

Explanation:

These are the best sources of information to use in each case. For detailed, well-researched information, a book is usually your best option. However, due to the time it takes to publish them, this is only an option for information that is over two years old. On the other hand, for basic, brief information on a topic, an encyclopedia is likely to work well. Finally, if you had to speak about Vietnam veterans, it would be best if you interviewed veterans themselves.

---

0,0(0 оценок)

Ответ:

davidoj13

26.10.2021

English

---

Usually indicates that the sentence was part of a quote where the first letter is not at the beginning of the sentence. So they do the [] to compensate. We do this so we do not lie.

Say that you wanted to quote me right here.
"[T]o quote me right here" would be appropriate.

---

0,0(0 оценок)