Its about history in im not really that good in it so i nd in that class
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- H Health and Medicine Heartburn: Causes and Ways to Get Rid of It...
- H Health and Medicine Simple and Effective: How to Get Rid of Cracked Heels...
- H Health and Medicine Relieving Swelling in Legs: Causes and Ways to Alleviate the Symptom...
- W Work and Career Мерчендайзинг – все, что нужно знать...
- O Other Everything You Need to Know About Kudyabliks...
- F Food and Cooking How to cook crayfish? Everything you need to know...
- F Food and Cooking Homemade kvass: recipe and brewing process...
- H Health and Medicine How to Choose the Right Tanning Cream?...
- S Style and Beauty Secrets of Tying a Pareo: 5 Ways...
- S Sport Running: How to Do It Right?...
Answers on questions: History
- B Biology The capillary membranes that filter substances moving between the cerebral blood vessels and the brain are called the...
- H History 1) in addition to bahrain, kuwait, oman, qatar, saudi arabia, united arab emirates, yemen, and iran, the nations of southwest asia include:2) in addition to myanmar, laos,...
- M Mathematics A DOG has coordinates D (B2), (2, -4) and G (-1, -1). A translation maps point D to D (2, 4). Find the coordinates of O and G under this translation. (6 points) O (1); G (-2)...
Ответ:
Ответ:
Moral relativism
Moral (or ethical) relativism asserts that that there are no "eternal" truths in regard to morality -- things that can be applied to all people of all times in all cultures or contexts. Instead, morality is understood in terms of what is seen as acceptable or noble in the world in which you are living. In this approach, cultural norms have much to do with establishing what is considered "moral" in any particular society. This view of morality thus accounts for why and how beliefs about right and wrong can be seen to shift and change over time within societies.
Ethical thinkers who object to moral relativism would argue that the relativists' approach ultimately means there is no true "morality," because then there is no standard by which right and wrong can be assessed on a lasting basis.