Sign In Sign Up Ask an AI advisor
jghdvine
jghdvine
09.04.2020 • 
History

The Supreme Court case of Tinker v. Des Moines dealt with two students who
were suspended from school for wearing black armbands to protest the
Vietnam War. Their parents sued the school district for violating the students'
right to free speech, but it was determined by lower courts that the school
district had the right to suspend them. When the Supreme Court reviewed the
case, it decided that the school district did not have the right to suspend the
students.
Which of these arguments is least effective in supporting the dissent of the
Supreme Court decision that the students had the right to wear the armbands
to school?
A. The school allowed students to wear other controversial symbols.
O
B. The armbands were shown to cause disruption that interfered with
learning.
C. The use of judicial review shows flaws in the majority opinion.
D. Other court cases upheld the rights of schools to limit freedom of
expression

Solved
Show answers

Ask an AI advisor a question

I want advice