What impact did the english common law have on the united states
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- S Sport How to Learn to Pull Up on Monkey Bars?...
- L Leisure and Entertainment Scrapbooking: What is it and Why is it Becoming More Popular?...
- H Horoscopes, Magic, Divination How to Cast a Love Spell on a Guy? Guide for Guys...
- F Family and Home How to Sew Curtain Tapes: Best Tips from Professionals...
- S Style and Beauty How are artificial nails removed?...
- S Style and Beauty How to Make Your Lips Fuller? Ideas and Tips for Beautiful Lips...
- F Food and Cooking The Disease That Haunted Abraham Lincoln...
- C Computers and Internet How to Get Rid of Windows Genuine Check?...
- H Health and Medicine How to perform artificial respiration?...
- S Style and Beauty Tricks and Tips: How to Get Rid of Freckles...
Answers on questions: History
- H History Where and when was George Washington born...
- H History In both 1980 and 1995, Quebecers voted to Canada. A. remain part of B. leave...
- H History No one- Me- I m sorry:/...
- H History What is meant by popular sovereighty?...
- H History Which of these best completes the diagram?...
- H History Why would the cabniet meeting be taking place in new york city?...
- H History What are the current 2017 committees of the legislative...
- H History Why did the powhatan kill hundreds of jamestown settlers?...
- H History Which of the following would be one of jimmy carter s greatest achievements in foreign policy?...
- H History What were some reasons teens might join a gang in the 60?...
Ответ:
Ответ:
Texas v. Johnson was a 1989 ruling of the United States Supreme Court, that stated that the laws condemning the profanation of the national flag, then in force in forty-eight states, were inconsistent with the First Amendment and the Federal Constitution which prohibited Congress from restricting freedom of speech.
The protection provided by the First Amendment, in the opinion of the Court, does not end only on the spoken and written words. The Court therefore rejected the argument that ignition of a flag can not be characterized as speech (since the First Amendment protects only speech). What is important to characterize a process as a speech is the intention to transfer a certain message through it, so, in the case, the burning of the flag was admitted as a speech and, therefore, protected by the First Amendment.