![Prettygirlyaya](/avatars/29902.jpg)
Prettygirlyaya
23.10.2019 •
History
What reason did taney give for why he believed dred scott was an enslaved person
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- O Other How to Choose the Best Answer to Your Question on The Grand Question ?...
- L Leisure and Entertainment History of International Women s Day: When Did the Celebration of March 8th Begin?...
- S Style and Beauty Intimate Haircut: The Reasons, Popularity, and Risks...
- A Art and Culture When Will Eurovision 2011 Take Place?...
- S Style and Beauty How to Choose the Perfect Hair Straightener?...
- F Family and Home Why Having Pets at Home is Good for Your Health...
- H Health and Medicine How to perform artificial respiration?...
- H Health and Medicine 10 Tips for Avoiding Vitamin Deficiency...
- F Food and Cooking How to Properly Cook Buckwheat?...
- F Food and Cooking How Many Grams Are In a Tablespoon?...
Answers on questions: History
- B Business Performance of activities would not be possible without activities. a. core; support b. primary; support c. support; primary d. strategic; support...
- S Social Studies Holly comes into matthew s bicycle shop to learn about the easy ride bicycle she saw in his newspaper ad. matthew shows her the floor sample of the bicycle and says that it is designed...
- H History The eye light and associates governments affirm that Germany excepts the responsibility of Germany and her allies for causing all the loss and damage to which the allied and associated...
- E English HELP ASAP PLEASEEEEEE I WILL GIVE BRANIELIEST...
Ответ:
The case of Dred Scott v. Sandford was a judicial claim, crucial in the history of the United States, resolved by the Supreme Court in 1857, in which it was decided to deprive any inhabitant of African descent, whether slaves or not, the right to citizenship; and the authority to prohibit slavery in federal territories of the country was removed from Congress. The decision was drafted by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney.
On March 6, 1857, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney issued the majority opinion. Taney ruled that:
-Anyone of African descent, whether slave or free, was not a citizen of the United States, according to the Constitution.
-The Ordinance of 1787 could not confer neither freedom nor citizenship within the Northwest Territory to non-white individuals.
-The provisions of the Missouri Compromise were annulled as a legislative act, since the act exceeded the powers of Congress, as it tried to exclude slavery and impart liberty and citizenship to non-white people in the north part of the Louisiana territory.
The court ruled that African-Americans had no right to freedom or citizenship. As they were not citizens, they did not have the legal capacity to file a lawsuit in federal court. Because slaves were private property, Congress did not have the power to regulate slavery in the territories and could not revoke the rights of a slave owner according to the place where he lived. This decision nullified the essence of the Missouri Compromise, which divided the territories into free or slave jurisdictions. Speaking on behalf of the majority, Taney ruled that because Scott simply considered himself the private property of his owners, he was subject to the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which prohibits taking ownership of his owner "without due process."
Ответ:
Aristotle
Explanation: The list of the greatest philosophers is incomplete without Aristotle. He was a Greek Philosophers and the founder of the Lyceum and the Peripatetic school of philosophy and Aristotelian tradition.