![abdullahs4639](/avatars/23373.jpg)
abdullahs4639
26.09.2019 •
Mathematics
A.)ii. and iii.
b.)ii.
c.)i.
d.)i. and iv.
Solved
Show answers
More tips
- C Computers and Internet How to Download Movies from Torrents?...
- S Style and Beauty How to Sew Harem Pants?...
- C Computers and Internet Е-head: How it Simplifies Life for Users?...
- F Family and Home How to Choose the Best Diapers for Your Baby?...
- F Family and Home Parquet or laminate, which is better?...
- L Leisure and Entertainment How to Properly Wind Fishing Line onto a Reel?...
- L Leisure and Entertainment How to Make a Paper Boat in Simple Steps...
- T Travel and tourism Maldives Adventures: What is the Best Season to Visit the Luxurious Beaches?...
- H Health and Medicine Kinesiology: What is it and How Does it Work?...
- O Other How to Choose the Best Answer to Your Question on The Grand Question ?...
Answers on questions: Mathematics
- M Mathematics Alice purchased a compass from an online retailer. The cost of the compass was $60.00, and was marked 40% off. Sales tax for the item is 7.5%, plus a shipping fee of...
- B Biology Why do land breezes and sea breezes occur?...
- P Physics Match the major interstellar gas type with the method used for observing that type. neutral hydrogen gas giant molecular clouds ionized hydrogen gas ultra-hot interstellar...
- M Mathematics Find the perimeter! ! (30 points)...
- M Mathematics What is the direct variation equation iffy varies directly with x and y = 12 when x= 6...
- M Mathematics Me pueden ayudar plis ?!...
Ответ:
The notation "p --> q" means "if p, then q". For example
p = it rains
q = the grass gets wet
So instead of writing out "if it rains, then the grass gets wet" we can write "p --> q" or "if p, then q". The former notation is preferred in a math class like this.
So when is the overall statement p --> q false? Well only if p is true leads to q being false. Why is that? It's because p must lead to q being true. The statement strongly implies this. If it rained and the grass didn't get wet, then the original "if...then" statement would be a lie, which is how I think of a logical false statement.
If it didn't rain (p = false), then the original "if...then" statement is irrelevant. It only applies if p were true. If p is false, then the conditional statement is known to be vacuously true. So this why cases iii and iv are true.
Ответ:
the answer would be 56 times 2
Step-by-step explanation: